Centos VS Red Hat: Direct comparison

The two systems are compatible in binary, which is why the Centos VS Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) comparison comes down to costs and support. As the open source solution will not be supported soon, the end result is clear.

RHEL vs centos: many common points, a crucial difference

If we compare Centos VS Red Hat Enterprise Linux, we first notice what connects the two Linux distributions. For Rhel, the responsible company is Red Hat, located in Raleigh in North Carolina, in the United States. Red Hat is also co-responsible for the Centos operating system. Since its first publication in 2002, Rhel has been considered one of the most popular and high -performance Linux platforms for commercial purposes. Companies benefit from great stability, convincing security architecture and great compatibility with many software packages. Paid support contracts are however compulsory to use it.

It is for this reason that Centos was introduced in 2004. This Linux distribution is based on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux sources packages And was developed as an alternative compatible with binaries. This Community Enterprise Operating System (Centos) is open source, which makes it much cheaper to use than the commercial alternative. Software compatible with RHEL can also be used almost without a cento restriction. While this evolution was first seen with a very bad eye by Red Hat, the company and the development project officially merged in 2014. From there, Centos was considered a community version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

We have examined the two systems for you and explain to you here which has the advantage in the Del Centos VS Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Centos VS RHEL: Target use and group

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is the market leader in the Linux Commercial distributions. The system has been expressly developed for theuse by companies And was therefore designed in particular for safe, stable and as flexible as possible. Private users are rather turning to cheaper or free systems like Centos. The platform is above all designed for a private use And offers many features as well as advantages that are not profitable otherwise due to high costs. In principle, Centos can or have been used at least by small businesses, which thus have access to most RHEL packages.

Centos VS RHEL: Different System Solutions

In the Centos VS Rhel comparison, the owner version offers much more choice. Red Hat provides you with, for each imaginable use, the Appropriate global package including the system, software, add-ons and appropriate support. You can therefore use distribution for use on the desktop, for servers and as a cloud solution. In comparison, Centos is rather designed as a unique solution for a multitude of requirements, without comparable specialization. For specific uses, it is therefore necessary to configure and install the corresponding software yourself.

Centos VS RHEL: support options

One hundred being a community project, there are many users who help beginners by answering their questions and problems. There operating system community is enormous and has the reputation of being very conscientious and helpful. However, there is no own official support. TIE companies certainly offer paid assistance, but there is no commercial assistance option of the Centos or Red Hat project. It is quite different for Rhel. The paid model includes Access to an individual support For all the problems encountered. In addition, for each version, there are three approaches.

The model Full Support de Rhel is valid for five years from the first publication. During this period, registered users receive Updates and safety fixes. Then comes the Support maintenancevalid for the following five years. Then there is the option Extended Life Phasewhich is still available up to two more years. Bug corrections can be requested as an option. Centos no longer maintained, there will be no more updates and security fixes from the summer of 2024.

Centos vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux: What is the best solution?

The question of who can win the Centos vs comparison. Rhel is therefore resolved, at least for the future. With the end of the support, the open source variant cannot more safe being usedthis is why companies in particular must go in search of an alternative to a hundred. One of the most obvious solutions remains Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The two operating systems have more or less the same features and overlap in many areas. Certainly, you must pay RHEL, but you benefit in return for the best possible medium. For companies, these costs should therefore be profitable.